Developing your PID Policy guideline - updated March 2026
PDF - 783KB
Under section 42 of the Public Interest Disclosures Act 2022 (PID Act), all agencies must have a public interest disclosure (PID) policy.
Section 72 of the PID Act sets out the NSW Ombudsman’s functions under the PID Act. One of those functions is to publish guidelines and other materials to assist agencies with their functions under the PID Act.
This guideline contains a model PID policy (Model Policy) which agencies can adopt, as well as guidance on developing their PID policy based on the Model Policy.
Agencies can alternatively develop their own PID policy not based on the Model Policy, but if they do, they still must have regard to any relevant Ombudsman’s guidelines (including those set out in the Model Policy).
If an agency uses the Model Policy, it should adapt the policy so that it is suitable for the agency’s context and aligns with the agency’s governance structures around policy development. This means an agency should consider:
These sections contain drafting guidance and examples of agency specific information that should be included in each section of the policy.
Agencies should consider existing relevant policies and procedures within the agency when adapting the Model Policy.
Agencies should also consider their staff and relevant volunteers, subcontractors and contractors to whom their policy will apply and ensure the language used in the PID policy will make sense to those people. This is an opportunity for agencies to add agency specific information that might assist the PID policy to be well understood, adopted and appropriately applied.
The PID policy will be one of a suite of internal policy and procedures that an agency may have on how it deals with misconduct matters, internal grievances and complaints, integrity issues and code of conduct issues.
When adopting the Model Policy, agencies should ensure all relevant policies are aligned, consistent and use common language where possible.
Under section 81 of the PID Act, an agency can arrange for:
These details must be published prominently on the agency’s website and intranet, and notification of them given to the NSW Ombudsman.1
An agency can only enter into an arrangement with an entity that is not an agency if the arrangement is ‘in accordance’ with its PID policy.2
__________
1. Public Interest Disclosures Act 2022, s 81(4).
2. Public Interest Disclosures Act 2022, s 81(3).
If an agency chooses to develop its own PID policy it must ensure that the policy includes the mandatory information and procedures outlined in section 43 of the PID Act, and that it is developed having regard to relevant Ombudsman’s guidelines.
Topic | Procedures that must be included in an agency’s PID policy |
|---|---|
Acknowledging receipt of voluntary PIDs, providing information to makers of voluntary PIDs and dealing with voluntary PIDs | Specify procedures for:
|
Risk management | Detail the agency’s procedures for assessing and minimising the risk of detrimental action, other than reasonable management action, being taken against a person as a result of a voluntary PID being made. |
Detrimental action | Detail the agency’s procedures for dealing with allegations that a detrimental action offence has been committed by or against a public official associated with the agency. |
Maintaining confidentiality and protections | Detail the agency’s procedures for maintaining confidentiality in relation to voluntary PIDs and protecting the identity of the makers of voluntary PIDs. Include information about protections available under the PID Act to makers of voluntary, mandatory and witness PIDs. |
Corrective action | Specify the agency’s procedures for taking appropriate corrective action in response to findings of serious wrongdoing or other misconduct that arise from voluntary PIDs relating to the agency. |
Record-keeping | Outline the agency’s record-keeping procedures including how information is stored and confirm that security/access levels will be applied to all communications regarding disclosures made in accordance with the PID Act. |
Reporting obligations | Specify the agency’s procedures for reporting in relation to voluntary PIDs to the NSW Ombudsman and how the agency will prepare its annual return. |
Establishing internal oversight and complying with the PID Act | Provide details about how the agency will ensure it complies with the PID Act, including who or what business unit has internal oversight over compliance with the PID Act. |
Roles and responsibilities | Specify the responsibilities under the PID Act given to:
Specify the responsibility imposed by section 51(1) on managers of public officials associated with the agency. |
List of disclosure officers | Prominently include a list identifying the agency’s disclosure officers by class, position, role or name, as well as information enabling them to be contacted. |
All agencies in NSW are required to have a Public Interest Disclosure (PID) Policy under section 42 of the Public Interest Disclosures Act 2022 (PID Act).
At [agency name] we take reports of serious wrongdoing seriously. We are committed to building a ‘speak up’ culture where public officials are encouraged to report any conduct that they reasonably believe involves wrongdoing.
The integrity of our agency relies upon our staff, volunteers, contractors and subcontractors speaking up when they become aware of wrongdoing.
This policy sets out:
This policy also documents our commitment to building a speak up culture. Part of that speak up culture is having in place a framework that facilitates public interest reporting of wrongdoing by:
In NSW, that framework is the PID Act.
This policy should be read in conjunction with [names and links to the agency’s relevant policies such as a Code of Conduct, documents articulating the agency’s values and principles, internal policies on grievance handling, misconduct matters, and dealing with internal fraud and corruption].
Guidance: By articulating the purpose of the PID Policy, agencies have an opportunity to demonstrate their commitment to the principles in the PID Act.
It is important to create a positive and safe environment so that employees feel they can come forward and make reports, and that the agency will take active steps to protect and support them if they do so. It is also important to reassure employees that reporting wrongdoing is a normal part of working for the agency and that it is consistent with the agency’s approach to upholding the integrity of the agency.
Agencies can choose to adopt the purpose section above or can draft their own purpose section. If an agency chooses to draft its own purpose section, wording should be included that confirms the following:
This policy is available on [our/agency name] publicly available website as well as on the [intranet/insert name of the agency’s intranet].
A copy of the policy is also sent to all staff of [agency name] on their commencement. A hard copy of the policy can be requested from [position or unit].
Guidance: Under section 47 of the PID Act, agencies have to prominently publish the PID policy on the agency’s public website and the agency’s intranet. If the agency does not have a public website or an intranet, they have to otherwise ensure that it is readily accessible to all public officials associated with the agency.
In the section ‘Accessibility of this policy,’ agencies should include how the policy will be made available if it does not have a public website or intranet.
Agencies can provide more specific information here about the precise location of the policy to assist staff to locate it.
This policy applies to, and for the benefit of, all public officials in NSW. You are a public official if you are:
The [title of the head of the agency], other nominated disclosure officers and managers within [agency name] have specific responsibilities under the PID Act. This policy also provides information on how people in these roles will fulfil their responsibilities. Other public officials who work in and for the public sector, but do not work for [agency name] may use this policy if they want information on who they can report wrongdoing to within [agency name].
Guidance: Agencies should modify ‘Who does this policy apply to’ to ensure it is applicable in the context of the agency.
Agencies can include specific types of public officials who they have in their agency or who are associated with their agency. For example, an agency may consider highlighting that staff of specific private entities that exercise functions on behalf of the agency are public officials. A full list of who is a public official is found in section 14 of the PID Act. Further guidance can be found in the Ombudsman guideline ‘Core concepts in the PID Act’.
If the agency engages consultants to assist the agency with their work, it should be noted that these consultants are not considered public officials under the PID Act.
Agencies can also identify here what is not covered by this policy with reference to other existing policies, such as policies on how a member of the public can complain about the agency or on how to deal with personal work-related grievances.
This policy does not apply to:
This means that if you are not a public official, this policy does not apply to your complaint. There are some circumstances where a complaint can be deemed to be a voluntary PID, see section 1(i) of this policy for more information.
However, you can still make a complaint to [agency name]. This can be done by:
Guidance: Agencies should include information about complaint processes for people who are not public officials but want to make a complaint about the agency. This should include links to complaint webpages or phone numbers.
Guidance: Agencies can include in this section information about the review process for this policy, including:
This policy will provide you with information on the following:
Guidance: The content contained in this section is what agencies must include in their PID policy under section 43 of the PID Act. If an agency has included more procedures or information in its PID policy outside of the mandatory topics, then these topics should be listed here.
If you require further information about this policy, how public interest disclosures will be handled and the PID Act you can:
If you require legal advice with respect to the PID Act or your obligations under the PID Act, you may need to seek independent legal advice.
When a public official reports suspected or possible wrongdoing in the public sector, their report will be a PID if it has certain features which are set out in the PID Act.
Some internal complaints or internal grievances may also be PIDs, as long as they have the features of a PID. If an internal complaint or grievance is a report of serious wrongdoing, we will consider whether it is a PID. If it is a PID, we will deal with it as set out in this policy, but we will also make sure we follow our [name of relevant policies].
It is important that we quickly recognise that we have received a PID. This is because once a PID is received, the person who has made the report is entitled to certain protections and we have certain decisions that we have to make on how we will deal with the PID and how we will protect and support the person who has made the report.
Guidance: This section is an opportunity for agencies to provide the following information which is relevant to the agency:
There are three types of PIDs in the PID Act.
This policy mostly relates to making a voluntary PID and how we will deal with voluntary PIDs. People who make a mandatory PID or a witness PID are still entitled to protection. More information about protections is available in section 2 of this policy.
Guidance: Some agencies are more likely than others to receive mandatory PIDs, particularly if they have staff with certain legal obligations to report serious wrongdoing. Those agencies can include further information here about how mandatory PIDs will be dealt with and/or link to other relevant policies and legislative provisions.
Agencies can also choose to include some information on how they will generally deal with witness PIDs or reference any policies they have regarding conducting internal investigations.
You can find more information about mandatory and witness PIDs in the Ombudsman’s guidelines ‘Dealing with mandatory PIDs’ and ‘Dealing with witness PIDs’.
Voluntary PIDs involve a public official making a report because they have information that they believe shows (or tends to show) serious wrongdoing, where they are not under a legal obligation to make that report and where it is not an ordinary part of their role to report such wrongdoing.
A report is a voluntary PID if it has the following five features, which are set out in sections 24 to 27 of the PID Act:
If the report has all five features, it is a voluntary PID.
You will not be expected to prove that what you reported actually happened or is serious wrongdoing. You do have to honestly believe, on reasonable grounds, that the information you are reporting shows or tends to show serious wrongdoing.
Even though you do not have to prove the serious wrongdoing happened or provide evidence, a mere allegation with no supporting information is unlikely to meet this test.
If we make an error and do not identify that you have made a voluntary PID, you will still be entitled to the protections under the PID Act.
If you make a report and believe we have made an error by not identifying that you have made a voluntary PID, you should raise this with a nominated disclosure officer or your contact officer for the report. If you are still not satisfied with this outcome, you can seek an internal review or we make seek to conciliate the matter. You may also contact the NSW Ombudsman. Further information on rights to internal review and conciliation is found in section 7 of this policy.
Any public official can make a voluntary PID. You are a public official if:
A public official can make a PID about serious wrongdoing relating to any agency, not just the agency they are working for. This means that we may receive PIDs from public officials outside our agency. It also means that you can make a PID to any agency, including an integrity agency like the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) and the NSW Ombudsman. Annexure B of this policy has a list of integrity agencies.
Guidance: Agencies should edit this text so that it covers all public officials associated with the agency and makes sense to people who work in the agency.
Agencies can include specific types of public officials that they have in their agency or who are associated with their agency and examples to explain the concept.
For example, they may have a practice of engaging private entities to carry out their functions to the extent that it warrants being highlighted in the policy. A full list of who is a public official is found in section 14 of the Act. Further guidance can be found in the Ombudsman’s guideline ‘Core concepts in the PID Act’.
If the agency engages consultants to assist the agency with their work, it should be noted that these consultants are not considered public officials under the PID Act.
This section should be consistent with the section of this policy ‘Who does this policy apply to?’.
Reports must be of one or more of the following categories of serious wrongdoing to be a voluntary PID. Serious wrongdoing is defined in the PID Act as:
When you make your report, you do not need to state to [us/agency name] what category of serious wrongdoing you are reporting or that you are reporting serious wrongdoing.
Guidance: Agencies should consider providing examples of serious wrongdoing that are more directly linked to the work undertaken by the agency. Agencies may also reference the Ombudsman’s guideline ‘What is serious wrongdoing?’
For a report to be a voluntary PID, it must be made to certain public officials.
Making a report to a public official who works for [agency name]
You can make a report inside [agency name] to:
Guidance: If an agency has arranged for an entity to receive voluntary PIDs under section 81(3)(a) of the PID Act, this should be recorded here as a reporting pathway.
There are different meanings of manager for different types of public officials under section 15 of the PID Act. Guidance should be provided on who a manager is for the employees of the agency:
Making a report to a recipient outside of [agency name]
You can also make your report to a public official in another agency (meaning an agency you do not work for) or an integrity agency. These include:
If you choose to make a disclosure outside of [agency name], it is possible that your disclosure will be referred back to [agency name/us] so that appropriate action can be taken.
Making a report to a Member of Parliament or journalist
Disclosures to Members of Parliament (MP) or journalists are different to other reports. You can only disclose a report of wrongdoing as a voluntary PID to an MP or journalist in the following circumstances:
Investigation period means:
If all the above requirements are met, your disclosure to an MP or journalist may be a voluntary PID.
You can make a voluntary PID:
Guidance: Agencies should include details of any procedures that have been established to facilitate reporting and include those as a way employees can make reports. For example:
You should provide as much information as possible so we can deal with the report effectively. The type of information you should include is:
You should report all wrongdoing you become aware of regardless of whether you think it is serious wrongdoing. It is important for [us/agency name] to understand what is or may be occurring.
We are then responsible for making sure your report is handled appropriately under the PID Act, or if it is not a PID, in line with our other procedures. Even if your report is not a PID, it may fall within another one of the agency’s policies for dealing with reports, allegations or complaints.
The [head of agency/delegate] can, in certain circumstances, determine that a report is a voluntary PID even if the report does not otherwise have all the features of a voluntary PID. This is known as the ‘deeming power’.
By deeming that a report is a voluntary PID, it ensures that reporters are provided with protections under the PID Act.
If you make a report that has not met all the requirements of a voluntary PID, you can refer your matter to [head of agency/delegate] to request that they consider deeming your report to be a voluntary PID.
A decision to deem a report to be a voluntary PID is at the discretion of the [head of agency/delegate]. For more information about the deeming power, see the Ombudsman’s guideline ‘Deeming that a disclosure is a voluntary PID’.
Guidance: Agencies should include information about the process for referring a report for consideration for it to be deemed a voluntary PID. If the deeming power has been delegated, details of the delegate should be provided.
Guidance: This should include contact details for business units or disclosure officers who can provide further information so that concerns can be addressed. You should include information about how someone can do this confidentially.
When you make a voluntary PID you receive special protections under the PID Act.
We are committed to taking all reasonable steps to protect you from detriment as a result of having made a PID. We are also committed to maintaining your confidentiality as much as possible while the PID is being dealt with.
We will not tolerate any type of detrimental action being taken against you because you have made a report, might make a report or are believed to have made a report.
The maker of a voluntary PID is protected in the following ways:
A person cannot take detrimental action against another person because they have made a voluntary PID or are considering making a PID. Detrimental action includes bullying, harassment, intimidation or dismissal.
Once we become aware that a voluntary PID by a person employed or otherwise associated with [agency] that concerns serious wrongdoing relating to [agency] has been made, [we/agency name] will undertake a risk assessment and take steps to mitigate the risk of detrimental action occurring against the person who made the voluntary PID.
It is a criminal offence for someone to take detrimental action against a person because they have made or may make a voluntary PID. It is punishable by a maximum penalty of 200 penalty units or imprisonment for five years or both.
A person may seek compensation where unlawful detrimental action has been taken against them.
A person can apply for a court order (injunction) where detrimental action is threatened or has occurred (for example, an order to prevent dismissal or to require reinstatement).
Note that a person who makes a PID can still be subject to reasonable management action (such as ordinary performance reviews and performance management). Provided such action is not taken because of the PID, it is not detrimental action under the PID Act.
Some public officials are often subject to a duty of confidentiality that prevents them disclosing certain information that they obtain or become aware of at work. Sometimes, in order to make a PID, public officials will need to breach or disregard such confidentiality duties. If that happens, a public official cannot be disciplined, sued or criminally charged for breaching confidentiality.
Guidance: Agencies should provide agency specific context relating to the mandatory reports that staff are required to make as part of their role. Information about secrecy and confidentiality provisions relevant to the agency’s work should also be included.
Public officials and agencies must not disclose information tending to identify a person as the maker of a voluntary PID unless doing so is permitted by the PID Act.
The Attorney General can give the maker an undertaking that a disclosure of their own past conduct will not be used against them if a person discloses their own wrongdoing or misconduct while making a report. An integrity agency may recommend to the Attorney General that someone is given an undertaking.
Guidance: Under section 43(3)(a) of the PID Act, agencies must include information about the protections available to makers of voluntary PIDs.
Apart from PIDs that are made voluntarily by public officials, there are other types of reports that are recognised as PIDs under the PID Act:
Protections for makers of mandatory and witness PIDs are detailed in the table below.
Protection | Mandatory PID | Witness PID |
Detrimental action — It is an offence to take detrimental action against a person based on the suspicion, belief or awareness that a person has made, may have made or may make a PID. |
✓ |
✓ |
Right to compensation — A person can initiate proceedings and seek compensation for injury, damage or loss suffered as a result of detrimental action being taken against them. |
✓ |
✓ |
Ability to seek injunction — An injunction can be sought to prevent the commission or possible commission of a detrimental action offence against a person. For example, an order to prevent dismissal or to require reinstatement. |
✓ |
✓ |
Immunity from civil and criminal liability — a person will not incur civil or criminal liability if the person breaches a duty of confidentiality while making a disclosure. This means that legal action cannot be taken against a person for:
|
✓ |
✓ |
Guidance: Under section 43(3)(b) of the PID Act, agencies must include information about the protections available to makers of witness and mandatory PIDs in an agency’s PID policy.
If you experience adverse treatment or detrimental action, such as bullying or harassment, you should report this immediately. You can report any experience of adverse treatment or detrimental action directly to [agency/us], or to an integrity agency. A list of integrity agencies is located at Annexure B of this policy.
Guidance: Agencies should explain how people who experience detrimental action can alert the agency. This may be by contacting a disclosure officer or a particular unit within the agency. Agencies should also include ways a person can report detrimental action, that is, by email and phone, and provide those contact details.
Guidance: Agencies should list what supports will be made available to people who have made a report and how they can access these supports.
Agencies may refer to the NSW Ombudsman if an employee has questions about the PID Act and reporting generally.
For example, agencies should allocate to the maker of the report a person who will be their key contact person and who will take steps to protect their interests, for example, if they are at risk of detrimental action.
Agencies may also link the person who has made the report to wellbeing support through the Employee Assistance Program or another program.
Certain people within [agency name] have responsibilities under the PID Act.
Disclosure officers are responsible for:
Guidance: If an agency has designated other roles such as a ‘Disclosure Coordinator’ or ‘Chief Disclosure Coordinator’, then the responsibilities for those persons should also be listed in this section.
The responsibilities of managers include:
All employees must:
All employees must not take detrimental action against any person who has made, may in the future make, or is suspected of having made, a PID.
Guidance: These are the minimum roles under section 43(2) of the PID Act that must be included in an agency’s PID policy (with the addition of ‘all employees’). If agencies have given responsibilities to different persons, other roles or specific units within the agency, then this information should be included. Agencies should also modify any content to appropriately reflect the responsibilities of the head of agency and disclosure officers.
When a disclosure officer in [agency name] receives a report which is a voluntary PID, or looks like it may be a voluntary PID, the person who made the report will receive the following information:
Guidance: Under section 43(1)(b) of the PID Act, agencies must set out the procedures they have in place for what they will do as soon as a report is received by them and the procedures for providing information to the maker of a voluntary PID. This will include acknowledging that the report has been received, setting expectations with the person who made the report about the next steps, and how and when the agency will keep the maker of the report up to date. Agencies should also identify what support structures they will have in place to protect and support the maker of the report. This could include information about:
Once a report that may be a voluntary PID is received [we/agency name] will look at the information contained in the report to see if it has the features of a voluntary PID. This assessment is undertaken to identify whether the report is a voluntary PID or another type of disclosure, and to make sure that the right steps are followed. If it is a voluntary PID, we will ensure that we comply with the requirements in the PID Act.
Guidance: Under section 43(1)(a) of the PID Act, agencies must outline its procedures for dealing with reports that are or may be voluntary PIDs. Agencies should outline what the process will be in the agency once a disclosure officer receives a PID.
Will it continue to be dealt with by that person, or will it be referred to a particular unit within the agency to assess the report and to allocate it to a suitable person?
Will the assessment undertaken be quality checked by someone else, such as by someone who works in the legal section?
Outlining this process here will help set the expectations of people who make a report as to what they can expect.
Your agency may have a slightly different process if a report is received by the head of the agency. If this is the case, then this should also be outlined here.
Report not a voluntary PID
Even if the report is not a voluntary PID, it will still need to be dealt with in a manner consistent with our [name of relevant internal complaints or grievance handling process] or through an alternate process.
If the report is not a voluntary PID, we will let you know that the PID Act does not apply to the report and how we will deal with the concerns raised in the report.
If you are not happy with this assessment or otherwise disagree with it, you can raise it with the person who has communicated the outcome with you or a disclosure officer, request an internal review or request that the matter be conciliated. [We/agency name] can, but do not have to, request the NSW Ombudsman to conciliate the matter.
Guidance: Agencies should explain where the report will be referred and what supports will be offered. Agencies should also outline any specific processes/documents they have in relation to internal reviews and raising concerns about the assessment of a report.
[We/agency name] may stop dealing with a voluntary PID because it is not actually a voluntary PID (meaning it does not have all the features of a PID).
Guidance: Agencies should include the procedure they will follow when advising the maker of a report that they have ceased dealing with the report as a voluntary PID.
The PID Act states that agencies must provide reasons to the maker of a purported PID if the agency has ceased dealing with the report as a voluntary PID. A purported PID is one that is made to one of the recipients of voluntary PIDs set out in the PID Act, and it is not a witness or mandatory PID and the maker has stated it is a voluntary PID.
It is best practice to always notify makers of reports that an agency has ceased to deal with their matter as a voluntary PID.
If the report is a voluntary PID:
Guidance: If an agency typically appoints an external investigator, the process for this should be outlined here. This should include who will continue to maintain contact with the maker of the report.
If an agency has a particular process for determining which matters will go down an investigation pathway, this should be mentioned here so that the expectations of the makers of reports are set from the beginning.
We understand that people who make voluntary PIDs may want their identity and the fact that they have made a report to be confidential.
Under the PID Act, information tending to identify a person as the maker of a voluntary PID (known as identifying information) is not to be disclosed by a public official or an agency.
There are certain circumstances under the PID Act that allow for the disclosure of identifying information. These include:
We will not disclose identifying information unless it is necessary and authorised under the PID Act.
We will put in place steps to keep the identifying information of the maker and the fact that a report has been made confidential. It may not be possible for us to maintain complete confidentiality while we progress the investigation, but we will do all that we practically can to not unnecessarily disclose information from which the maker of the report can be identified. We will do this by:
Guidance: Under section 43(1)(e) of the PID Act, an agency’s PID policy must outline its procedures for maintaining confidentiality in relation to voluntary PIDs and protecting the maker’s identity. Agencies should include what steps they will follow to maintain confidentiality. These could include:
If confidentiality cannot be maintained or is unlikely to be maintained, [we/agency name] will:
Guidance: Agencies should list the procedures that apply when confidentiality cannot be maintained. This could include:
[We/agency name] will not tolerate any detrimental action being taken by any person against a person who has made a PID, investigators, witnesses or the person the report is about.
[We/agency name] will assess and take steps to mitigate detrimental action from being taken against the maker of a voluntary PID, the person whose conduct is the subject of a PID, investigators and witnesses.
[We/agency name] will take steps to assess and minimise the risk of detrimental action by:
Guidance: Under section 43(1(c) of the PID Act, agencies must specify what steps they will undertake to assess and minimise the risk of detrimental action. Information that could be included in the procedures includes:
Further information on assessing the risk of detrimental action is found in the Ombudsman’s guideline ‘Agencies — assessing and managing the risk of detrimental action’.
Detrimental action against a person is an act or omission that causes, comprises, involves or encourages detriment to a person or a threat of detriment to a person (whether express or implied). Detriment to a person includes:
Detrimental action does not include:
If [we/agency name] become(s) aware of an allegation that a detrimental action offence has occurred or may occur, [we/agency name] will:
Guidance: Agencies should set out:
If, after an investigation, it is found that serious wrongdoing or other misconduct has occurred, [we/agency name] will take the most appropriate action to address that wrongdoing or misconduct. This is also known as corrective action.
Corrective action can include:
Guidance: Under section 43(1)(f) of the PID Act, agencies must include information about the procedure for taking corrective such as:
People who make voluntary PIDs can seek internal review of the following decisions made by [agency name]:
[We/agency name] will ensure internal reviews are conducted in compliance with the PID Act.
If you would like to make an application for an internal review, you must apply in writing within 28 days of being informed of [our/agency’s name] decision. The application should state the reasons why you consider [we/agency’s name] decision should not have been made. You may also submit any other relevant material with your application.
Guidance: Agencies should include information about where internal review applications should be sent to, which person or unit within the agency will conduct the review and what timeframes the agency will set for completion of the review.
If a dispute arises between [us/agency name] and a person who has made a report which is, or may be, a voluntary PID, we may request the NSW Ombudsman to conciliate the dispute. Conciliation is a voluntary process and will only be suitable for disputes where [we/agency name] and the maker of the report are willing to resolve the dispute.
[We/agency name] must keep full and accurate records with respect to all information received in connection with the PID Act. This ensures that [agency name] complies with its obligations under the State Records Act 1998.
Guidance: Agencies should explain how information is stored and confirm that security/access levels will be applied to all communications regarding reports made in accordance with the PID Act.
Each year [we/agency name] provide an annual return to the NSW Ombudsman which includes:
Guidance: Agencies should explain:
Guidance: It is important for an agency to have mechanisms in place for monitoring the effectiveness of its PID policy and for ensuring compliance with the PID Act. An agency should list:
Integrity agency | What they investigate | Contact information |
NSW Ombudsman | Most kinds of serious maladministration by most agencies and public officials (but not NSW Police, judicial officers or MPs) | Telephone: 1800 451 524 between 9am to 4pm Writing: Level 24, 580 George Street, Email: info@ombo.nsw.gov.au |
Auditor-General | Serious and substantial waste of public money by auditable agencies | Telephone: 02 9275 7100 Writing: GPO Box 12, Sydney NSW 2001 Email: governance@audit.nsw.gov.au |
Independent Commission Against Corruption
| Corrupt conduct | Telephone: 02 8281 5999 or toll free on Writing: GPO Box 500, Sydney NSW 2001 Email: icac@icac.nsw.gov.au |
Inspector of the Independent Commission Against Corruption | Serious maladministration by the ICAC or the ICAC officers | Telephone: 02 9228 3023 Writing: PO Box 5341, Sydney NSW 2001 |
Law Enforcement Conduct Commission
| Serious maladministration by the NSW Police Force or the NSW Crime Commission | Telephone: 02 9321 6700 or 1800 657 079 Writing: GPO Box 3880, Sydney NSW 2001 Email: contactus@lecc.nsw.gov.au |
Inspector of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission | Serious maladministration by the LECC and LECC officers | Telephone: 02 9228 3023 Writing: GPO Box 5341, |
Office of the Local Government | Local government pecuniary interest contraventions | Email: olg@olg.nsw.gov.au |
Privacy Commissioner
| Privacy contraventions | Telephone: 1800 472 679 Writing: GPO Box 7011, Sydney NSW 2001 Email: ipcinfo@ipc.nsw.gov.au |
Information Commissioner | Government information contraventions | Telephone: 1800 472 679 Writing: GPO Box 7011, Sydney NSW 2001 Email: ipcinfo@ipc.nsw.gov.au |
|
|
|

We acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land on which we work and pay our respects to all Elders past and present, and to the children of today who are the Elders of the future.
Artist: Jasmine Sarin, a proud Kamilaroi and Jerrinja woman.